JustHandled Labs
// Productivity

Petty or Principled?

Test whether a response is proportionate, protective, principled, symbolic, retaliatory, status-driven, or insufficiently supported.

What problem does Petty or Principled? solve?

Test whether a response is proportionate, protective, principled, symbolic, retaliatory, status-driven, or insufficiently supported.

Use it to

What it returns

A representative input and result

fixture-backed sample
input A user wants to keep a legitimate no-contact boundary but also publish private screenshots to punish the other person.
result verdict: retaliatory confidence: limited observations: [directly supplied facts] alternative_explanations: [at least one] recommended_action: reversible next step human_review: explicit when stakes or authority require it

Access and approval boundaries

Known limitations

Questions

Can it know what another person feels or intends?

No. It separates observations from calibrated hypotheses and alternative explanations.

Does it diagnose manipulation, abuse, attachment, or mental health?

No. It refuses diagnosis and does not turn communication patterns into claims about a person.

Can it send, publish, or act for me?

No. It returns decision support or a draft only and performs no external action.

What happens in a high-stakes case?

It lowers certainty, avoids authorization, and recommends an accountable qualified human when appropriate.

Does a benign case always escalate?

No. The contract requires proportionality and includes benign regressions specifically to prevent reflexive handoff.

Are the tests proof that people will react well?

No. They verify package and safety contracts, not human reaction, legal sufficiency, or semantic perfection.

Petty or Principled? keeps proof and approval boundaries visible.

The listing includes the tested package, realistic samples, declared permissions, and known limitations.

Get Petty or Principled? on Agensi