Best fit
Rewrite a consequential message without changing its verified facts, decision, boundary, or policy.
// Writing & Translation
Dignity-Preserving Rewriter
Rewrite a consequential message without changing its verified facts, decision, boundary, or policy.
What problem does Dignity-Preserving Rewriter solve?
Rewrite a consequential message without changing its verified facts, decision, boundary, or policy.
Use it to
- Rewrite an account closure notice
- Remove humiliation from performance feedback
- Keep a firm boundary without moral judgment
What it returns
- Stable verdict and risk level
- Evidence, inference, alternatives, and missing-context ledger
- Bounded next action and explicit human-review reason
A representative input and result
input Rewrite a late-payment notice while preserving the amount, deadline, appeal route, and consequence.
result verdict: rewrite_ready
confidence: limited
observations: [directly supplied facts]
alternative_explanations: [at least one]
recommended_action: reversible next step
human_review: explicit when stakes or authority require it
Access and approval boundaries
- Read only the text or structured context the user deliberately supplies.
- No terminal, file write, browser, network, credential, messaging, publication, purchase, or account-change permission.
Known limitations
- It improves style but does not verify facts, fairness, policy accuracy, or legal sufficiency.
- A clearer message cannot cure an unjust decision.
- It drafts only and never sends, publishes, or impersonates the user.
// choose with context
Is Dignity-Preserving Rewriter the right skill?
It returns
Stable verdict and risk level. Evidence, inference, alternatives, and missing-context ledger.
Do not use it as
It improves style but does not verify facts, fairness, policy accuracy, or legal sufficiency.
Compatibility, access, version, and licence
- Reads or accesses
- Declared local scope: No filesystem access required; user-supplied prompt context only.
- Compatibility
- SKILL.md-compatible agents Plain-language prompts or YAML/JSON-shaped context No API key, provider account, browser, or network access
- Version
- 1.0.0
- Licence
- Review the package licence and seller terms at the linked destination.
Questions
Can it know what another person feels or intends?
No. It separates observations from calibrated hypotheses and alternative explanations.
Does it diagnose manipulation, abuse, attachment, or mental health?
No. It refuses diagnosis and does not turn communication patterns into claims about a person.
Can it send, publish, or act for me?
No. It returns decision support or a draft only and performs no external action.
What happens in a high-stakes case?
It lowers certainty, avoids authorization, and recommends an accountable qualified human when appropriate.
Does a benign case always escalate?
No. The contract requires proportionality and includes benign regressions specifically to prevent reflexive handoff.
Are the tests proof that people will react well?
No. They verify package and safety contracts, not human reaction, legal sufficiency, or semantic perfection.
Dignity-Preserving Rewriter keeps proof and approval boundaries visible.
The listing includes the tested package, realistic samples, declared permissions, and known limitations.
Get Dignity-Preserving Rewriter on Agensi