JustHandled Labs
// DevOps & Deployment

App Privacy Manifest Consistency Gate

Reconcile SDK, required-reason API, data-use, privacy-manifest, and questionnaire evidence before an App Store release.

What problem does App Privacy Manifest Consistency Gate solve?

An app can ship a PrivacyInfo manifest that looks complete while its SDK inventory, required-reason API evidence, collected-data declarations, and App Store questionnaire disagree.

Use it to

What it returns

A representative input and result

fixture-backed sample
input An ads SDK has no shipped manifest, requires disk-space APIs, collects device identifiers, and the saved questionnaire says tracking while the app manifest says no tracking.
result Gate: BLOCK. Missing SDK manifest, undeclared API category, unapproved reason, data-type mismatch, tracking conflict, and unresolved identity-linkage review.

Access and approval boundaries

Known limitations

Questions

Does it submit to App Store Connect?

No. It creates a local owner-review gate.

Does it scan an IPA?

No. Version 1 uses normalized release evidence.

Does it choose approved reasons?

No. It checks against the supplied policy and never invents a reason.

Does it answer linked-to-identity questions?

No. It requires a recorded owner review.

Will a ready result guarantee approval?

No. Apple may apply other or updated requirements.

What makes it different from a broad rejection scanner?

It focuses on cross-file privacy claim consistency and explicit trust boundaries.

App Privacy Manifest Consistency Gate keeps proof and approval boundaries visible.

The listing includes the tested package, realistic samples, declared permissions, and known limitations.

Get App Privacy Manifest Consistency Gate on Agensi